Page not foundThe requested URL: http://www.ideacenter.org/santorum.htm could not be found. Use the search below if you are looking for something in particular. The following 15 items may contain what you are looking for:Background on the Santorum Amendment to No Child Left Behind ActResources Please wait a second. You are being redirected
U. S. Senate Passes Santorum Amendment, Supports Critical Thinking Regarding Evolutionary TheoryResources ***Santorum Amendment Update***
On January 8, 2002, President Bush signed into law the H.R. 1, the "No Child Left Behind Act," into which the "Santorum Amendment" was originally included. There has been some dispute over whether or not the Santorum Amendment (further described below) was actually IDEA Center discussed during radio interview with Casey Luskin on KPRZNews Legal Resources LinksResources The best legal resource you can find is an attorney. Nonetheless, below is a list of resources we have enjoyed reading which you might also find informative regarding legal issues!
"Intelligent Design Will Survive Kitzmiller v. Dover," by and David K. DeWolf, John G. West, Casey Luskin, publisheFOX News Story: Eliminate Evolution?Resources The following article was written by a member of the IDEA Center staff, Ryan Huxley in response to "Eliminate Evolution?," on the Hannity & Colmes portion of the FOX news show.
Dear Mr. Hannity and Mr. Colmes:
I am writing on behalf of the Intelligent Design and Evolution Awareness (IDEA) CenterInformation on the National Center for Science Educaton (NCSE)Resources This page is a work in progress, but for now, it houses some basic information about the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) and how to respond to some of their basic arguments against intelligent design and general creationism.
First, a bit about the NCSE:
The NCSE is, "a nonprofit, FAQ: Does ID want to sneak creationism through the "back door" (into science and schools)?Resources The Short Answer: Of course our answer to this question is "no." ID proponents are very clear about what they want: (1) for legitimate scientific critiques of evolution to be taught and (2) for teachers to be free to teach the evidence supporting intelligent design, if they want to do so. This iAt Risk: Intellectual Freedom and Objective Science EducationResources The following article was written by Franklin, Wisconson Board of Education member Nancy Thompson in response to "Guest Viewpoint: 'Intelligent design' not accepted by most scientists" by NCSE directors Eugenie C. Scott and Glenn Branch.
At Risk: Objective Science Education
"The Conferees rFAQ: Doesn't ID suggest eliminating evolution from schools or "watering down" the curriculum?Resources
The Short Answer: No. Members of the ID movement want to teach evolution--and teach it better! We want all the evidence surrounding the origins issue to be taught, and we want students to understand evolution better, and learn the full range of scientific evidence on the important subject of "oPrimer: History of intelligent design and the creation - evolution controversyResources 1611: King James Bible published5
1654: Archbishop Usher calculates that the world was created in 4004 B.C. 5
1802: Paley publishes "Natural Theology"5
1830: Charles Lyell publishes Principles of Geology, one of Darwin's primary sources5
1859: T.H. Huxley, atheist, "Darwin's Bulldog," and sAt Risk: Intellectual Freedom and Objective Science EducationNews Darwin's Predictable DefendersResources A response to the NCSE, Posted with permission
The National School Boards Association enlisted Eugenie Scott and Glenn Branch to criticize intelligent design bullet point fashion. Here I want to respond to these bullet-point assertions. I would repeat the entire article, but copyright restrictiIntroductionResources Welcome to our Law and Education quote collection. Many of the quotes in our collections have been verified for accuracy, but not all have been verified. Thus, we present our quote-collections as a starting point for research, and suggest you verify any individual quote before using it.
If you haveResponse to James O. Goldsborough's "Another attempt to deny evolution"Resources
Introduction
On February 12, 2004, San Diego Union Tribune columnist James O. Goldsborough wrote an opinion article entitled "Another attempt to deny evolution." Dozens of news or opinion (or opinionated news) articles have been written nationwide regarding intelligent design over the paPBS Launches Controversial 7-Part Series, "Evolution"Resources
Quick Quote
"When we replace the traditional idea of God the creator with the idea of the process of natural selection doing the creating, the creation is as wonderful as it ever was. All that great design work had to be done. It just wasn’t done by an individual, it was done by this huge process |